
First, let me start by saying that this review is spoiler free. In fact, after all this talk I’ve heard of Moon spoilers and whether or not the trailer gave something major away (it didn’t), I feel obligated to say that its not all that easy to spoil. Traditionally, it may be a mystery movie, but one of the film’s major charms is that it doesn’t act like the major science fiction mystery that it is. Instead, it chooses to stay low key, and focus more on characters and small personal interactions then it does grand realizations and twist endings. There is no big reveal; in fact, there really isn’t a reveal at all. I’d say Moon is a prime example of how to give the viewer answers without needing big moments or spelled out answers. Everything comes naturally, and not once does the film hesitate to give anything away or stop to explain the question it just answered. It’s a mystery movie without reveals, a refreshing change in the direction of modern cinema.
But enough about the so called spoilers, lets talk about Sam Rockwell. To say that this is the best performance of the year so far is a grave understatement. His ability to create a character is astounding, and the emotion he shows makes us begin to care more about his reactions to the growing realizations then the realizations themselves. As I mentioned earlier, the film plays more on characters and interactions then it does plot or “mystery”. This is do in no small part to Sam Rockwell. As much as I think this was a fine debut from Duncan Jones, this is Rockwell’s movie. He carries it from start to finish and without him; the whole movie would probably have fallen apart. It’s his biggest roles yet and he does wonders with it. Kevin Spacey, too, does a great job as the amiable robot. This brings me to my next point.
*MINOR SPOILERS*
Robots. They keep killing people in sci-fi movies. Or, at the very least, attempting to kill people. So often do they end up killing people in modern science fiction, that when they don’t, I breathe a sigh of relief at the originality of whichever movie choose not have made the robot a soulless insane human-killer. In this case, that movie is Moon. It doesn’t make a big deal about it, in fact, for most of the film’s runtime the robot’s intentions are ambiguous in such a way to suggest that it’s neither good nor bad. The bad guys, if there are any, are humanity. Which is unique in modern sci-fi. I don’t really care about robots, but that was to illustrate a point.
*END SPOILERS*
Moon is a completely original sci-fi movie. When pressured to think of something to compare it to, I keep falling short. In general, sci-fi likes to be big and grand, but Moon seemed to revel in being low key and personal. It had grand ideas, but it kept them on the small scale. It is possible that this choice was not a conscious one, and was instead a product of small budget, but even so, it made the film that much easier to relate to and ultimately that much more powerful. Second perhaps to Rockwell, this is the film’s greatest strength. Too often a film can get carried away with its ideas or its attempts to create an “epic world” for its characters, and loose track of the characters themselves or the small things that make the world so interesting. That’s where Moon shines, and from this, it creates a unique experience that is ultimately more charming and relatable then things like Blade Runner or 2001.
Maybe it’s for this reason that everyone is hailing this as the next big thing in sci-fi. “The future classic of the genre”. I can say that I, for one, agree. I would not be surprised if many years from now people looked back at Moon as being revolutionary or groundbreaking. Certainly, it is a refreshing change in a tired genre. And I would love to see it revive the genre in a way that isn’t simply continuing it. Originality is hard to come by these days, but Moon’s got it. By the handfuls.


















And really its quite charming, in that home movie low budget way.